Veneerlay – estetyczna i funkcjonalna technika rekonstrukcji (...)

Veneerlay – estetyczna i funkcjonalna technika rekonstrukcji (...)

Dostęp do tego artykułu jest płatny.
Zapraszamy do zakupu!

Cena: 18.00 PLN (z VAT)

Po dokonaniu zakupu artykuł w postaci pliku PDF prześlemy bezpośrednio pod twój adres e-mail.

Kup artykuł
MS 2021; 9: 16-36.


Veneerlay – estetyczna i funkcjonalna technika rekonstrukcji zębów bocznych. Aktualne wskazania i procedury kliniczne

Veneerlay – an aesthetic and functional technique for posterior reconstruction. Current indications and clinical procedures

Adam Romaniuk‑Demonchaux

Streszczenie
Celem artykułu jest przedstawienie wskazań do stosowania adhezyjnych uzupełnień pośrednich typu veneerlay oraz szczegółowy opis postępowania klinicznego.

Abstract
The aim of the article is to present indications for the use of adhesive indirect restorations (veneerlay) and a detailed description of the clinical procedure.

Hasła indeksowe: veneerlay, zęby boczne, ceramika

Key words: veneerlay, posterior teeth, ceramics

PIŚMIENNICTWO

  1. Bandéca MC, Pinto SCS, Tonetto MR i wsp. Interactions between restorative dentistry and periodontics. Preparation and cementation of an onlay in empress (Part III). World J Dent. 2014; 5(2): 138-142.
  2. Liebenberg WH. Posterior composite resin restorations. Operative innovations. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 1996; 8(8): 769-778.
  3. Rocca GT, Krejci I. Crown and post-free adhesive restorations for endodontically treated posterior teeth. From direct composite to endocrowns. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2013; 8(2): 156-179.
  4. Magne P. No post, no crown. Biomimetic restorative dentistry. Los Angeles: Global Institute for Dental Education; 2012.
  5. Magne P, Dietschi D, Holz J. Esthetic restorations for posterior teeth. Practical and clinical considerations. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1996; 16(2): 104-119.
  6. Vailati F, Belser UC. Full-mouth adhesive rehabilitation of a severely eroded dentition. The three-step technique. Part 1. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2008; 3(1): 30-44.
  7. Deliperi S, Bardwell DN. Clinical evaluation of direct cuspal coverage with posterior composite resin restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2006; 18(5): 256-265, discussion 266-267.
  8. Wassell RW, Walls AW, McCabe JF. Direct composite inlays versus conventional composite restorations. 5-year follow-up. J Dent. 2000; 28(6): 375-382.
  9. Pallesen U, Qvist V. Composite resin fillings and inlays. An 11-year evaluation. Clin Oral Investig. 2003; 7(2): 71-79.
  10. Spreafico RC, Krejci I, Dietschi D. Clinical performance and marginal adaptation of class II direct and semidirect composite restorations over 3,5 years in vivo. J Dent. 2005; 33(6): 499-507.
  11. Swift Jr EJ. Processed composites. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2001; 13(5): 284-291.
  12. Dietschi D, Magne P, Holz J. Recent trends in esthetic restorations for posterior teeth. Quintessence Int. 1994; 25(10): 659-677.
  13. Dietschi D, Spreafico R. Adhesive metal-free restorations. Current concepts for the esthetic treatment of posterior teeth. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing; 1997.
  14. Dietschi D, Spreafico R. Current clinical concepts for adhesive cementation of tooth-colored posterior restorations. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 1998; 10(1): 47-54.
  15. Reeh ES, Messer HH, Douglas WH. Reduction in tooth stiffness as a result of endodontic and restorative procedures. J Endod. 1989; 15(11): 512-516.
  16. Goel VK, Khera SC, Gurusami S i wsp. Effect of cavity depth on stresses in a restored tooth. J Prosthet Dent. 1992; 67(2): 174-183.
  17. Rocca GT, Rizcalla N, Krejci I i wsp. Evidence-based concepts and procedures for bonded inlays and onlays. Part II. Guidelines for cavity preparation and restoration fabrication. Int J Esthet Dent. 2015; 10(3): 392-413.
  18. Veneziani M. Adhezyjne uzupełnienia pośrednie w odcinku bocznym. Aktualne wskazania i technika opracowania zębów oparta na morfologii. Quintessence Stomatol. 2017; 4: 212-233.
  19. Reeh ES, Messer HH, Douglas WH. Reduction in tooth stiffness as a result of endodontic and restorative procedures. J Endod. 1989; 15(11): 512-516.
  20. Romaniuk-Demonchaux A. Adhezyjne uzupełnienia pośrednie w złamanych zębach bocznych. Analiza problemu klinicznego. Mag Stomatol. 2019; 10: 16-32.
  21. Dietschi D, Spreafico R. Adhesive metal-free restorations. Current concepts for the esthetic treatment of posterior teeth. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing; 1997.
  22. Paul SJ, Schärer P. The dual bonding technique. A modified method to improve adhesive luting procedures. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1997; 17(6): 536-545.
  23. Dietschi D, Herzfeld D. In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of class II resin composite restorations after thermal and occlusal stressing. Eur J Oral Sci. 1998; 106(6): 1033-1042.
  24. Magne P, Hyung Kim T, Cascione D i wsp. Immediate dentin sealing improves bond strength of indirect restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2005; 94(6): 511-519.
  25. Magne P, Spreafico R. Deep margin elevation. A possible adjunct procedure to immediate sealing. Am J Esthet Dent. 2012; 2: 86-96.
  26. Dietschi D, Monasevic M, Krejci I i wsp. Marginal and internal adaptation of class II restorations after immediate or delayed composite placement. J Dent. 2002; 30(5-6): 259-269.
  27. Griggs JA. Recent advances in materials for all-ceramic restorations. Dent Clin North Am. 2007; 51(3): 713-727.
  28. Cagidiaco MC, Ferrari M, Garberoglio R i wsp. Dentin contamination protection after mechanical preparation for veneering. Am J Dent. 1996; 9(2): 57-60.
  29. Pashley EL, Comer RW, Simpson MD i wsp. Dentin permeability. Sealing the dentin in crown preparations. Oper Dent. 1992; 17(1): 13-20.
  30. Pashley DH, Tay FR, Haywood VB i wsp. Consensus-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of dentin hypersensitivity. Inside Dentistry. 2008; 4(9) (nr specj.): 1-37.
  31. Duarte RM, de Goes MF, Montes MA. Effect of time on tensile bond strength of resin cement bonded to dentine and low-viscosity composite. J Dent. 2006; 34(1): 52-61.
  32. Magne P. Immediate dentin sealing. A fundamental procedure for indirect bonded restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2005; 17(3): 144-154, discussion 155.
  33. Brännström Sensitivity of dentine. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1966; 21(4): 517-526.
  34. Peumans M, Voet M, De Munck J i wsp. Four-year clinical evaluation of a self-adhesive luting agent for ceramic inlays. Clin Oral Investig. 2013; 17(3): 739-750.
  35. Trowbridge HO, Silver DR. A review of current approaches to in-office management of tooth hypersensitivity. Dent Clin North Am. 1990; 34(3): 561-581.
  36. Paul SJ, Scharer P. Factors in dentin bonding. Part II: A review of the morphology and physiology of human dentin. J Esthet Dent. 1993; 5(2): 51-54.
  37. Paul SJ, Scharer P. Intrapulpal pressure and thermal cycling. Effect on shear bond strength of eleven modern dentin bonding agents. J Esthet Dent. 1993; 5(4): 179-185.
  38. Stavridakis MM, Krejci I, Magne P. Immediate dentin sealing of onlay preparations. Thickness of pre-cured Dentin Bonding Agent and effect of surface cleaning. Oper Dent. 2005; 30(6): 747-757.
  39. Romaniuk-Demonchaux A. Adhezja w stomatologii rekonstrukcyjnej. Mag Stomatol. 2020; 2: 12-27.
  40. Romaniuk-Demonchaux A. Relokacja brzegu ubytku zlokalizowanego poddziąsłowo w technice adhezyjnej – analiza problemu klinicznego. Mag Stomatol. 2019; 7-8: 50-66.
  41. Magne P, Kwon KR, Belser UC i wsp. Crack propensity of porcelain laminate veneers. A simulated operatory evaluation. J Prosthet Dent. 1999; 81(3): 327-334.
  42. Schmidt KK, Chiayabutr Y, Philips KM i wsp. Influence of preparation design and existing condition of tooth structure on load to failure of ceramic laminate veneers. J Prosthet Dent. 2011; 105(6): 374-382.
  43. Yamamoto T, Nakamura Y, Nishide A i wsp. Contraction stresses in direct and indirect composite restorations compared by crack analysis. J Adhes Dent. 2013; 15(1): 47-54.
  44. van Dijken JW, Hasselrot L, Ormin A i wsp. Restorations with extensive dentin/enamel-bonded ceramic coverage. A 5-year follow-up. Eur J Oral Sci. 2001; 109(4): 222-229.
  45. Park S-H, Kim S-S, Cho Y-S i wsp. Curing units’ ability to cure restorative composites and dual-cured composite cements under composite overlay. Oper Dent. 2004; 29(6): 627-635.
  46. Gregor L, Bouillaguet S, Onisor I i wsp. Microhardness of light- and dual-polymerizable luting resins polymerized through 7,5-mm-thick endocrowns. J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 112(4): 942-948.
  47. Dietschi D, Marret N, Krejci I. Comparative efficiency of plasma and halogen light sources on composite micro-hardness in different curing conditions. Dent Mater. 2003; 19(6): 493-500.