Małgorzata Tomasik

Streszczenie
W pracy przedstawiono najważniejsze cele i zasady korekty wypełnień kompozytowych z zachowaniem ważnych zasad okluzji. Wiedza na temat morfologii zębów i ich funkcji, a także uważna obserwacja indywidualnych cech uzębienia pacjenta pozwala na zminimalizowanie potrzeby dostosowywania wypełnienia.
Umiejętne zastosowanie folii okluzyjnych jako „złotego standardu” umożliwia odpowiednią kontrolę i dostosowanie wypełnienia do warunków zgryzowych.

Abstract
The paper presents the most important goals and principles of the occlusal adjustment of composite restorations while maintaining important rules of occlusion. Knowledge of the morphology of the teeth and function as well as careful observation of the individual characteristics of the patient’s dentition allows to minimize the need for occlusal correction. Skillful use of the occlusal foil as a „gold standard”, allows for optimal control and adjustment of the direct restoration.

Piśmiennictwo
1. Scolavino S, Paolone G, Orsini G i wsp. Predictable direct composite restorations in posteriors. The Simultaneous Modeling Technique. Int J Esthet Dent. 2016; 11: 1‑25.
2. Gross M. Occlusion in implant dentistry. A review of the literature of prosthetic determinants and current concepts. Aust Dent J. 2008; 53(1): S60‑S68.
3. Forrester S, Presswood R, Toy A i wsp. Occlusal measurement method can affect SEMG activity during occlusion. J Oral Rehabil. 2011; 38(9): 655‑660.
4. Carey JP, Craig M, Kerstein RB i wsp. Determining a relationship between applied occlusal load and articulating paper mark area. Open Dent J. 2007; 1: 1‑7.
5. Sharma A, Rahul GR, Poduval ST i wsp. History of materials used for recording static and dynamic occlusal contact marks: a literature review. J Clin Exp Dent; 2013; 5(1): e48‑e53.
6. Barbosa JM, Urtula AB, Hirata R i wsp. Thickness evaluation of articulating papers and foils. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018; 30(1): 70‑72.
7. Jurkowski P., Kostrzewa‑Janicka J., Mierzwińska‑Nastalska E. Komputerowy system analizy
zwarcia T‑Scan III – budowa, funkcje i zastosowanie. Protet Stomatol. 2012; 62(2): 100‑109.
8. Bozhkova TP. Comparative study of occlusal contact marking indicators. Folia Med (Plovdiv). 2020; 62(1): 180‑184.
9. Saad MN, Weiner G, Ehrenberg D i wsp. Effects of load and indicator type upon occlusal contact markings. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2008; 85(1): 18‑22.
10. Kerstein RB, Radke J. Clinician accuracy when subjectively interpreting articulating paper markings. Cranio. 2014; 32(1): 13‑23.
11. Dias RAB, Rodrigues MJP, Messias AL i wsp. Comparison between conventional and computerised methods in the assessment of an occlusal scheme. J Oral Rehabil. 2020; 47(2): 221‑228.
12. Baba K, Tsukiyama Y, Clark GT. Reliability, validity, and utility of various occlusal measurement methods and techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 2000; 83(1): 83‑89.
13. Carossa S, Lojacono A, Schierano G i wsp. Evaluation of occlusal contacts in the dental laboratory: influence of strip thickness and operator experience. Int J Prosthodont. 2000; 13(3): 201‑204.
14. Millstein P, Maya A. An evaluation of occlusal contact marking indicators. A descriptive quantitative method. J Am Dent Assoc. 2001; 132(9): 1280‑1286.
15. da Costa Silva PF, Motta LJ, Silva SM i wsp. Computerized analysis of the distribution of occlusal contacts in individuals with Parkinson’s disease and temporomandibular disorder. Cranio.
2016; 34(6): 358‑362.
16. Brizuela‑Velasco A, Alvarez‑Arenal A, Ellakuria‑Echevarria J i wsp. Influence of articulating paper thickness on occlusal contacts registration: a preliminary report. Int J Prosthodont. 2015; 28(4): 360‑362.
17. Afrashtehfar KI, Qadeer S. Computerized occlusal analysis as an alternative occlusal indicator. Cranio. 2016; 34(1): 52‑57.
18. Kerstein RB. Current applications of computerized occlusal analysis in dental medicine. Gen Dent. 2001; 49(5): 521‑530.
19. Solaberrieta E, Etxaniz O, Otegi JR i wsp. Customized procedure to display T‑Scan occlusal contacts. J Prosthet Dent. 2017; 117(1): 18‑21.
20. Warreth A, Doody K, Al‑Mohsen M i wsp. Fundamentals of occlusion and restorative dentistry. Part II: occlusal contacts, interferences and occlusal considerations in implant patients. J Ir Dent Assoc. 2015; 61(5): 252‑259.