Dostęp do tego artykułu jest płatny.
Zapraszamy do zakupu!
Cena: 12.50 PLN (z VAT)
Kup artykuł
Po dokonaniu zakupu artykuł w postaci pliku PDF prześlemy bezpośrednio pod twój adres e-mail.
Streszczenie
W artykule na podstawie dostępnego piśmiennictwa poddano analizie czynniki, które mają wpływ na pionowe złamanie korzenia (VRF) w następstwie mechanicznego opracowania kanałów w trakcie leczenia endodontycznego.
Abstract
Study based on literature review, analyzes factors that affect the resistance of instrumented teeth to vertical root fracture (VRF) followed by endodontic treatment.
Hasła indeksowe: pionowe złamanie korzenia, podatność na złamanie, preparacja kanału, uszkodzenia zębinowe
Key words: vertical root fracture, fracture resistance, root canal preparation, dentinal defects
Piśmiennictwo
1. AAE: Cracking The Cracked Tooth Code: Detection and Treatment of Various Longitudinal Tooth Fractures. AAE Endod. Colleagues Excell. [Internet], 2008, Summer, 2‑7.
2. Jeng J.H. i wsp.: Clinical and radiographic characteristics of vertical root fractures in en‑ dodontically and nonendodontically treated teeth. J. Endod., 2017, 43, 5, 687‑693.
3. Hadrossek P.H., Dammaschke T.: New treatment option for an incomplete vertical root fracture – a preliminary case report. Head Face Med., 2014, 10, 1, 9.
4. Lo C.M. i wsp.: Analysis of reasons for extraction of endodontically treated teeth: a pro‑ spective study. J. Endod., 2011, 37, 11, 1512‑1515.
5. Fuss Z., Lustig J., Tamse A.: Prevalence of vertical root fractures in extracted endodon‑ tically treated teeth. Int. Endod. J., 1999, 32, 4, 283‑286.
6. Yan W. i wsp.: Reduction in fracture resistance of the root with aging. J. Endod., 2017, 43, 9, 1494‑1498.
7. Wilcox L.R.: The relationship of root canal enlargement to finger ‑spreader induced verti‑ cal root fracture. J. Endod., 1997, 23, 8, 533‑534.
8. Wu M.K. i wsp.: The ability of different nickel ‑titanium rotary instruments to induce den‑ tinal damage during canal preparation. J. Endod., 2008, 35, 2, 236‑238.
9. Çiçek E. i wsp.: Evaluation of microcrack formation in root canals after instrumentation with different NiTi rotary file systems: A scanning electron microscopy study. Scanning, 2015, 37, 1, 49‑53.
10. Mandava J. i wsp.: Micro ‑computed tomographic evaluation of dentinal defects after root canal preparation with hyflex edm and vortex blue rotary systems. J. Clin. Exp. Dent., 2018, 10, 9, e844 ‑e851.
11. Ashwinkumar V. i wsp.: Effect of reciprocating file motion on microcrack formation in root canals: An SEM study. Int. Endod. J., 2014, 47, 7, 622‑627.
12. Topçuo‐lu H.S. i wsp.: The effects of Mtwo, R ‑Endo, and D ‑RaCe retreatment instru‑ ments on the incidence of dentinal defects during the removal of root canal filling material. J. Endod., 2014, 40, 2, 266‑270.
13. Kim H.C. i wsp.: Potential relationship between design of nickel ‑titanium rotary instru‑ ments and vertical root fracture. J. Endod., 2010, 36, 7, 1195‑1199.
14. Çiçek E., Aslan M.A., Akkoçan O.: Comparison of the resistance of teeth instrumented with different nickel ‑titanium systems to vertical root fracture: An in vitro study. J. Endod., 2015, 41, 10, 1682‑1685.
15. Jalali S. i wsp.: Effects of Reciproc, Mtwo and ProTaper instruments on formation of root fracture. Iran. Endod. J., 2015, 10, 4, 252‑255.
16. Miguéns ‑Vila R. i wsp.: Vertical root fracture initiation in curved roots after root canal preparation: A dentinal micro ‑crack analysis with LED transillumination. J. Clin. Exp. Dent., 2017, 9, 10, e1218 ‑e1223.
17. Solomonov M. i wsp.: Stress generation during self ‑adjusting file movement: minimal‑ ly invasive instrumentation. J. Endod., 2013, 39, 12, 1572‑1575.
18. Yoldas O. i wsp.: Dentinal microcrack formation during root canal preparations by dif‑ ferent NiTi rotary instruments and the self ‑adjusting file. J. Endod., 2012, 38, 2, 232‑235.
19. Ossareh A., Rosentritt M., Kishen A.: Biomechanical studies on the effect of iatrogenic dentin removal on vertical root fractures. J. Conserv. Dent. [Internet], 2018, 21, 3, 290‑296.
20. Huynh N. i wsp.: Biomechanical effects of bonding pericervical dentin in maxillary pre‑ molars. J. Endod., 2018, 44, 4, 659‑664.
21. Zandbiglari T., Davids H., Schäfer E.: Influence of instrument taper on the resistance to fracture of endodontically treated roots. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. En‑ dod., 2006, 101, 1, 126‑131.
22. Krikeli E., Mikrogeorgis G., Lyroudia K.: In vitro comparative study of the influence of in‑ strument taper on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth: an integrative ap‑ proach – based analysis. J. Endod., 2018, 44, 9, 1407‑1411.
23. Singla M. i wsp.: Comparative evaluation of rotary ProTaper, Profile, and conventional stepback technique on reduction in Enterococcus faecalis colony ‑forming units and verti‑ cal root fracture resistance of root canals. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol En‑ dod., 2010, 109, 3, e105 ‑e110.
24. Pedullà E. i wsp.: Effects of 6 single ‑file systems on dentinal crack formation. J. En‑ dod., 2017, 43, 3, 456‑461.
25. Bayram H.M. i wsp.: Micro‑computed tomographic evaluation of dentinal microcrack formation after using new heat ‑treated nickel ‑titanium systems. J. Endod., 2017, 43, 10, 1736‑1739.
26. Ashraf F. i wsp.: Stereomicroscopic evaluation of dentinal cracks at different instrumen‑ tation lengths by using different rotary files (ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next, and HyFlex CM): an ex vivo study. Scientifica (Cairo), 2016, 2016.
27. Uğur Aydın Z., Keskin N.B., Özyürek T.: Effect of Reciproc blue, XP‐endo shaper, and Wa‑ veOne gold instruments on dentinal microcrack formation: A micro‐computed tomographic evaluation. Microsc. Res. Tech., 2019, 82, 6, 856‑860.
28. Aksoy C. i wsp.: Evaluation of XP ‑endo Shaper, Reciproc Blue, and ProTaper Universal NiTi systems on dentinal microcrack formation using micro‑computed tomography. J. En‑ dod., 2019, 45, 3, 338‑342.
29. Piva E. i wsp.: Influence of cervical preflaring on the incidence of root dentin defects. J. Endod., 2017, 44, 2, 286‑291.
30. Arslan H. i wsp.: Effect of ProTaper Universal, Endoflare, Revo ‑S, HyFlex coronal flaring instruments, and Gates Glidden drills on crack formation. J. Endod., 2014, 40, 10, 1681‑1683.
31. Liu R. i wsp.: Incidence of apical root cracks and apical dentinal detachments after ca‑ nal preparation with hand and rotary files at different instrumentation lengths. J. Endod., 2013, 39, 1, 129‑132.
32. Çitak M., Özyürek T.: Effect of different nickel ‑titanium rotary files on dentinal crack for‑ mation during retreatment procedure. J. Dent. Res. Dent. Clin. Dent. Prospects, 2017, 11, 2, 90‑95.
33. Bürklein S., Tsotsis P., Schäfer E.: Incidence of dentinal defects after root canal prepara‑ tion: Reciprocating versus rotary instrumentation. J. Endod., 2013, 39, 4, 501‑504.
34. Wu M.K. i wsp.: The incidence of root microcracks caused by 3 different single ‑file sys‑ tems versus the ProTaper system. J. Endod., 2013, 39, 8, 1054‑1056.
35. Wei X. i wsp.: The incidence of dentinal cracks during root canal preparations with re‑ ciprocating single ‑file and rotary ‑file systems: A meta ‑analysis. Dent. Mater. J., 2017, 36, 3, 243‑252.
36. Arslan H. i wsp.: Incidence of dentinal cracks after root canal preparation with twisted file adaptive instruments using different kinematics. J. Endod., 2015, 41, 7, 1130‑1133.
37. Zuolo M.L. i wsp.: Micro‑computed tomography assessment of dentinal micro ‑cracks after root canal preparation with TRUShape and Self ‑adjusting File systems. J. Endod., 2017, 43, 4, 619‑622.
38. Marins J. i wsp.: Lack of causal relationship between dentinal microcracks and root ca‑ nal preparation with reciprocation systems. J. Endod., 2014, 40, 9, 1447‑1450.
39. de Oliveira B.P. i wsp.: Micro‑computed tomographic analysis of apical microcracks be‑ fore and after root canal preparation by hand, rotary, and reciprocating instruments at dif‑ ferent working lengths. J. Endod., 2017, 43, 7, 1143‑1147.
40. de Almeida A. i wsp.: Occurence of dentinal defects after root canal preparation with R ‑phase, M ‑Wire and Gold Wire instruments: a micro ‑CT analysis. BMC Oral Health, 2017, 17, 1, 93.
41. Pelegrine R.A. i wsp.: Micro‑computed tomography versus the cross ‑sectioning me‑ thod to evaluate dentin defects induced by different mechanized instrumentation techniqu‑ es. J. Endod., 2017, 43, 12, 2102 ‑2107.
Piśmiennictwo
1. AAE: Cracking The Cracked Tooth Code: Detection and Treatment of Various Longitudinal Tooth Fractures. AAE Endod. Colleagues Excell. [Internet], 2008, Summer, 2‑7.
2. Jeng J.H. i wsp.: Clinical and radiographic characteristics of vertical root fractures in en‑ dodontically and nonendodontically treated teeth. J. Endod., 2017, 43, 5, 687‑693.
3. Hadrossek P.H., Dammaschke T.: New treatment option for an incomplete vertical root fracture – a preliminary case report. Head Face Med., 2014, 10, 1, 9.
4. Lo C.M. i wsp.: Analysis of reasons for extraction of endodontically treated teeth: a pro‑ spective study. J. Endod., 2011, 37, 11, 1512‑1515.
5. Fuss Z., Lustig J., Tamse A.: Prevalence of vertical root fractures in extracted endodon‑ tically treated teeth. Int. Endod. J., 1999, 32, 4, 283‑286.
6. Yan W. i wsp.: Reduction in fracture resistance of the root with aging. J. Endod., 2017, 43, 9, 1494‑1498.
7. Wilcox L.R.: The relationship of root canal enlargement to finger ‑spreader induced verti‑ cal root fracture. J. Endod., 1997, 23, 8, 533‑534.
8. Wu M.K. i wsp.: The ability of different nickel ‑titanium rotary instruments to induce den‑ tinal damage during canal preparation. J. Endod., 2008, 35, 2, 236‑238.
9. Çiçek E. i wsp.: Evaluation of microcrack formation in root canals after instrumentation with different NiTi rotary file systems: A scanning electron microscopy study. Scanning, 2015, 37, 1, 49‑53.
10. Mandava J. i wsp.: Micro ‑computed tomographic evaluation of dentinal defects after root canal preparation with hyflex edm and vortex blue rotary systems. J. Clin. Exp. Dent., 2018, 10, 9, e844 ‑e851.
11. Ashwinkumar V. i wsp.: Effect of reciprocating file motion on microcrack formation in root canals: An SEM study. Int. Endod. J., 2014, 47, 7, 622‑627.
12. Topçuo‐lu H.S. i wsp.: The effects of Mtwo, R ‑Endo, and D ‑RaCe retreatment instru‑ ments on the incidence of dentinal defects during the removal of root canal filling material. J. Endod., 2014, 40, 2, 266‑270.
13. Kim H.C. i wsp.: Potential relationship between design of nickel ‑titanium rotary instru‑ ments and vertical root fracture. J. Endod., 2010, 36, 7, 1195‑1199.
14. Çiçek E., Aslan M.A., Akkoçan O.: Comparison of the resistance of teeth instrumented with different nickel ‑titanium systems to vertical root fracture: An in vitro study. J. Endod., 2015, 41, 10, 1682‑1685.
15. Jalali S. i wsp.: Effects of Reciproc, Mtwo and ProTaper instruments on formation of root fracture. Iran. Endod. J., 2015, 10, 4, 252‑255.
16. Miguéns ‑Vila R. i wsp.: Vertical root fracture initiation in curved roots after root canal preparation: A dentinal micro ‑crack analysis with LED transillumination. J. Clin. Exp. Dent., 2017, 9, 10, e1218 ‑e1223.
17. Solomonov M. i wsp.: Stress generation during self ‑adjusting file movement: minimal‑ ly invasive instrumentation. J. Endod., 2013, 39, 12, 1572‑1575.
18. Yoldas O. i wsp.: Dentinal microcrack formation during root canal preparations by dif‑ ferent NiTi rotary instruments and the self ‑adjusting file. J. Endod., 2012, 38, 2, 232‑235.
19. Ossareh A., Rosentritt M., Kishen A.: Biomechanical studies on the effect of iatrogenic dentin removal on vertical root fractures. J. Conserv. Dent. [Internet], 2018, 21, 3, 290‑296.
20. Huynh N. i wsp.: Biomechanical effects of bonding pericervical dentin in maxillary pre‑ molars. J. Endod., 2018, 44, 4, 659‑664.
21. Zandbiglari T., Davids H., Schäfer E.: Influence of instrument taper on the resistance to fracture of endodontically treated roots. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. En‑ dod., 2006, 101, 1, 126‑131.
22. Krikeli E., Mikrogeorgis G., Lyroudia K.: In vitro comparative study of the influence of in‑ strument taper on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth: an integrative ap‑ proach – based analysis. J. Endod., 2018, 44, 9, 1407‑1411.
23. Singla M. i wsp.: Comparative evaluation of rotary ProTaper, Profile, and conventional stepback technique on reduction in Enterococcus faecalis colony ‑forming units and verti‑ cal root fracture resistance of root canals. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol En‑ dod., 2010, 109, 3, e105 ‑e110.
24. Pedullà E. i wsp.: Effects of 6 single ‑file systems on dentinal crack formation. J. En‑ dod., 2017, 43, 3, 456‑461.
25. Bayram H.M. i wsp.: Micro‑computed tomographic evaluation of dentinal microcrack formation after using new heat ‑treated nickel ‑titanium systems. J. Endod., 2017, 43, 10, 1736‑1739.
26. Ashraf F. i wsp.: Stereomicroscopic evaluation of dentinal cracks at different instrumen‑ tation lengths by using different rotary files (ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next, and HyFlex CM): an ex vivo study. Scientifica (Cairo), 2016, 2016.
27. Uğur Aydın Z., Keskin N.B., Özyürek T.: Effect of Reciproc blue, XP‐endo shaper, and Wa‑ veOne gold instruments on dentinal microcrack formation: A micro‐computed tomographic evaluation. Microsc. Res. Tech., 2019, 82, 6, 856‑860.
28. Aksoy C. i wsp.: Evaluation of XP ‑endo Shaper, Reciproc Blue, and ProTaper Universal NiTi systems on dentinal microcrack formation using micro‑computed tomography. J. En‑ dod., 2019, 45, 3, 338‑342.
29. Piva E. i wsp.: Influence of cervical preflaring on the incidence of root dentin defects. J. Endod., 2017, 44, 2, 286‑291.
30. Arslan H. i wsp.: Effect of ProTaper Universal, Endoflare, Revo ‑S, HyFlex coronal flaring instruments, and Gates Glidden drills on crack formation. J. Endod., 2014, 40, 10, 1681‑1683.
31. Liu R. i wsp.: Incidence of apical root cracks and apical dentinal detachments after ca‑ nal preparation with hand and rotary files at different instrumentation lengths. J. Endod., 2013, 39, 1, 129‑132.
32. Çitak M., Özyürek T.: Effect of different nickel ‑titanium rotary files on dentinal crack for‑ mation during retreatment procedure. J. Dent. Res. Dent. Clin. Dent. Prospects, 2017, 11, 2, 90‑95.
33. Bürklein S., Tsotsis P., Schäfer E.: Incidence of dentinal defects after root canal prepara‑ tion: Reciprocating versus rotary instrumentation. J. Endod., 2013, 39, 4, 501‑504.
34. Wu M.K. i wsp.: The incidence of root microcracks caused by 3 different single ‑file sys‑ tems versus the ProTaper system. J. Endod., 2013, 39, 8, 1054‑1056.
35. Wei X. i wsp.: The incidence of dentinal cracks during root canal preparations with re‑ ciprocating single ‑file and rotary ‑file systems: A meta ‑analysis. Dent. Mater. J., 2017, 36, 3, 243‑252.
36. Arslan H. i wsp.: Incidence of dentinal cracks after root canal preparation with twisted file adaptive instruments using different kinematics. J. Endod., 2015, 41, 7, 1130‑1133.
37. Zuolo M.L. i wsp.: Micro‑computed tomography assessment of dentinal micro ‑cracks after root canal preparation with TRUShape and Self ‑adjusting File systems. J. Endod., 2017, 43, 4, 619‑622.
38. Marins J. i wsp.: Lack of causal relationship between dentinal microcracks and root ca‑ nal preparation with reciprocation systems. J. Endod., 2014, 40, 9, 1447‑1450.
39. de Oliveira B.P. i wsp.: Micro‑computed tomographic analysis of apical microcracks be‑ fore and after root canal preparation by hand, rotary, and reciprocating instruments at dif‑ ferent working lengths. J. Endod., 2017, 43, 7, 1143‑1147.
40. de Almeida A. i wsp.: Occurence of dentinal defects after root canal preparation with R ‑phase, M ‑Wire and Gold Wire instruments: a micro ‑CT analysis. BMC Oral Health, 2017, 17, 1, 93.
41. Pelegrine R.A. i wsp.: Micro‑computed tomography versus the cross ‑sectioning me‑ thod to evaluate dentin defects induced by different mechanized instrumentation techniqu‑ es. J. Endod., 2017, 43, 12, 2102 ‑2107.
