Istotne klinicznie cechy bioceramicznych uszczelniaczy endodontycznych. Przegląd piśmiennictwa

Istotne klinicznie cechy bioceramicznych uszczelniaczy endodontycznych. Przegląd piśmiennictwa

Dostęp do tego artykułu jest płatny.
Zapraszamy do zakupu!

Cena: 12.50 PLN (z VAT)

Po dokonaniu zakupu artykuł w postaci pliku PDF prześlemy bezpośrednio pod twój adres e-mail.

Kup artykuł
MS 2019; 10: 72-78.

Streszczenie

Prawidłowe wypełnienie systemu kanałowego jest jednym z najważniejszych etapów warunkujących uzyskanie sukcesu w leczeniu endodontycznym. Materiałoznawstwo stomatologiczne jako stale rozwijająca się gałąź medycyny pozwala na wykorzystanie materiałów o coraz lepszych właściwościach. Należą do nich między innymi bioceramiczne uszczelniacze kanałowe. W artykule przedstawiono, na podstawie dostępnego piśmiennictwa, cechy bioceramicznych uszczelniaczy endodontycznych mające znaczenie kliniczne.

 
Abstract
Proper root canal filling is one of the most important stages that leads to success in endodontic treatment. Dental materials science is a constantly developing branch of medicine that allows to use materials with progressively better properties. One of them are bioceramic endodontic sealers. On the basis of the literature this article presents properties of bioceramic endodontic sealers that are clinically important.
 
Hasła indeksowe: bioceramika, uszczelniacze kanałowe
 
Key words: bioceramic, endodontic sealers

PIŚMIENNICTWO
1. Hench L.L.: The story of Bioglass. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med., 2006, 17, 967-978.
2. Malhotra S., Hegde M.N., Shetty Ch.: Bioceramic technology in endodontics. Brit. J. Med. Med. Res., 2014, 4, 12, 2446-2454.
3. Al-Sanabani J.S., Madfa A.A., Al-Sanabani F.A.: Application of calcium phosphate materials in dentistry. Int. J. Biomater., 2013, 2013, 876132, doi: 10.1155/2013/876132
4. Kossev D., Stefanov V.: Ceramics-based sealers as new alternative to currently used endodontic sealers. Roots, 2009, 1, 42-48.
5. Bansode P.V. i wsp.: A review of bioceramic sealers in endodontic. J. Dent. Med. Sci., 2018, 17, 5, 82-86.
6. Koch K., Brave D., Nasseh A.A.: A review of bioceramic technology in endodontics. Roots, 2012, 4, 6-12.
7. Simon S., Flouriot A.Ch.: BioRoot RCS – nowy biomateriał do wypełniania kanałów korzeniowych na stałe. https://www.septodont.com.pl/products/bioroot-rcs
8. Camilleri J.: BioRoot RCS – czy możliwa jest zmiana paradygmatu wypełniania kanału korzeniowego? https://www.septodont.com.pl/training-research/clinical-research
9. Al-Haddad A., Aziz Z.A.Ch.A.: Bioceramic-based root canal sealers: a review. Int. J. Biomater., 2016, 2016, 9753210, doi: 10.1155/2016/9753210
10. Koch K., Brave D.: Bioceramic technology – the game changer in endodontics. Endod. Pract., 2009, 12, 7-11.
11. Koch K., Brave D.: The increased use of bioceramics in endodontics. Dentaltown, 2009, 10, 4, 39-43.
12. Debelian G., Trope M.: The use of premixed bioceramic materials in endodontics. Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gien.2016.09.001
13. Nagas E. i wsp.: Dentin moisture conditions affect the adhesion of root canal sealer. J. Endod., 2012, 38, 2, 240-244.
14. Yap W.Y. i wsp.: An in vitro comparison of bond strength of different sealers/obturation systems to root dentin using the push-out test at 2 weeks and 3 months after obturation. Med. Princ. Pract., 2017, 26, 5, 464-469.
15. Al-Haddad A.Y. i wsp.: The effect of moisture conditions on the constitution of two bioceramic-based root canal sealers. J. Dent. Sci., 2017, 12, 340-346.
16. Poggio C. i wsp.: Comparative cytotoxicity evaluation of eight root canal sealer. J. Clin. Exp. Dent., 2017, 9, 4, e574-e578.
17. Candeiro G.T.M. i wsp.: Cytotoxicity, genotoxicity and antibacterial effectiveness of a bioceramic endodontic sealer. Int. Endod. J., 2016, 49, 9, 858-864.
18. Silva E.J.N.L. i wsp.: Cytotoxicity profile of endodontic sealers provided by 3D cell culture experimental model. Braz. Dent. J., 2016, 27, 6, 652-656.
19. Koch K., Brave D.: EndoSequence: melding endodontics with restorative dentistry, part 3. dentistrytoday.com, 03.2009, 48-51.
20. Zhang H. i wsp.: Antibacterial activity of endodontic sealers by modified direct contact test against Enterococcus faecalis. J. Endod., 2009, 35, 7, 1051-1055.
21. Mohammadi Z., Shalavi S., Yazdizadeh M.: Antimicrobial activity of calcium hydroxide in endodontics: a review. Chonnam Med. J., 2012, 48, 133-140.
22. Estrela C. i wsp.: Mechanism of action of calcium and hydroxyl ions of calcium hydroxide on tissue and bacteria. Braz. Dent. J., 1995, 6, 2, 85-90.
23. Zhou H.M. i wsp.: Physical properties of 5 root canal sealers. J. Endod., 2013, 39, 10, 1281-1286.
24. Candeiro G.T.D.M. i wsp.: Evaluation of radioopacity, pH, release of calcium ions and flow of a bioceramic root canal sealer. J. Endod., 2012, 38, 6, 842-845.
25. Zeid S.T.H.A., Saleh A.A.Y M.: Solubility, pH changes and releasing elements of different bioceramic and mineral trioxide aggregate root canal sealers comparative study. J. Trauma Treat., 2015, 4, 2.
26. Siboni F. i wsp.: Properties of BioRoot RCS, a tricalcium silicate endodontic sealer modified with povidone and polycarboxylate. Int. Endod. J., 2017, 50, 120-136.
27. Poggio C. i wsp.: Solubility and pH of bioceramic root canal sealers: a comparative study. J. Clin. Exp. Dent., 2017, 9, 10, 1189-1194.
28. Tanomaru-Filho M. i wsp.: In vitro antimicrobial activity of endodontic sealers, MTA-based cements and Portland cement. J. Oral Sci., 2007, 49, 1, 41-45.
29. Morgental R.D. i wsp.: Antibacterial activity of two MTA-based root canal sealers. Int. Endod. J., 2011, 44, 12, 1128-1133.
30. Sakr O.M. i wsp.: Evaluation of microleakage in endodontically treated teeth with two different types of sealers: bioceramic based sealer and AH26, an in vitro study. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci., 2017, 6, 12, 3556-3564.
31. Wang Y., Liu S., Dong Y.: In vitro study of dentinal tubule penetration and filling quality of bioceramic sealer. Plos One, 01.02.2018.
32. Al-Haddad A., Abu Kasim N.H., Che Ab Aziz Z.A.: Interfacial adaptation and thickness of bioceramic-based root canal sealers. Dent. Mat. J., 2015, 34, 4, 516-521.
33. Lee J.K. i wsp.: Physicochemical properties of epoxy resin-based and bioceramic-based root canal sealers. Bioinorganic Chemistry and Applications, 2017, ID 2582849, doi.org/10.1155/2017/2582849
34. Intrnational Standard ISO 6876, Dentistry – Root canal sealing materials. Third edition, 2012-06-01.
35. Chang S.W. i wsp.: Comparison of the rheological properties of four root canal sealers. Int. J. Oral Sci., 2015, 7, 1, 56-61.
36. Azadi N. i wsp.: A four-week solubility assessment of AH-26 and four new root canal sealers. Dent. Res. J., 2012, 9, 1, 31-35.
37. Tanomaru-Filho M. i wsp.: Radioopacity and flow of different endodontic sealers. Acta Odontol. Latinoamer., 2013, 26, 2, 121-125.
38. Yaman Y., Gulsahi K.: Evaluation of the effect of different root canal obturation materials on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots. Austin J. Dent., 2018, 5, 2, 01-05.
39. Phukan A.H. i wsp.: The effect of different root canal sealers on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth – in vitro study. Dent. Res. J., 2017, 14, 6, 382-388.
40. Ioannidis K. i wsp.: Spectrophotometric analysis of crown discoloration induced by MTA- and ZnOE-based sealers. J. Appl. Oral Sci., 2013, 21, 2, 138-144.
41. Savadkouhi S.T., Fazlyab M.: Discoloration potential of endodontic sealers: a brief review. Iran. Endod. J., 2016, 11, 4, 250-254.
42. Sherif D.A. i wsp.: Evaluation of root canals filled with bioceramic sealer after retreatment with two different techniques. Tanta Dent. J., 2017, 14, 76-82.
43. Hess D. i wsp.: Retreatability of bioceramic root canal sealing material. J. Endod., 2011, 37, 11, 1547-1549.
44. Wilcox L.R. i wsp.: Endodontic retreatment: evaluation of gutta-percha and sealer removal and canal reinstrumentation. J. Endod., 1987, 13, 9, 453-457.
45. Kakoura F., Pantelidou O.: Retreatment efficacy of endodontic bioceramic sealers: a review of the literature. Odovtos – Int. J. Dent. Sci., 2018, 20-2, 39-50.