Implantologia wspomagana komputerowo

Dostęp do tego artykułu jest płatny.
Zapraszamy do zakupu!

Cena: 5.40 PLN (z VAT)

Po dokonaniu zakupu artykuł w postaci pliku PDF prześlemy bezpośrednio pod twój adres e-mail.

Kup artykuł
Computer-assisted implantology

Tomasz Smektała, Marcin Tutak, Marcin Jędrzejewski, Marta Kłonica, Marcin Metlerski, Katarzyna Sporniak-Tutak

Praca zawiera podstawowe informacje dotyczące stomatologicznych szablonów implantologicznych. Autorzy omawiają rodzaje szablonów, procedurę wykonania, wyniki i powikłania związane z ich użyciem oraz czynniki wpływające na dokładność implantacji z ich zastosowaniem.

Hasła indeksowe: szablon implantologiczny, szablon chirurgiczny, implantologia sterowana komputerowo, CAD/CAM

The study contains basic information regarding dental implant guides. The authors discuss types of templates, the procedure that is carried out, the results and complications associate with their use, together with the factors influencing the accuracy of implantation with their  use.

Key words: implant guide, surgical guide, computer-assisted implantology, CAD/CAM


1. Miyata T. i wsp.: The influence of controlled occlusal overload on peri-implant tissue. Part 3: A histologic study in monkeys. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants, 2000 15, 3, 425-431.

2. Isidor F.: Histological evaluation of peri-implant bone at implants subjected to occlusal overload or plaque accumulation. Clin. Oral Implants Res., 1997, 8, 1, 1-9.

3. Naert I., Duyck J., Vandamme K.: Occlusal overload and bone/implant loss. Clin. Oral Implants Res., 2012, 23,  Suppl. 6, 95-107.

4. Ravald N. i wsp.: Long-term evaluation of Astra Tech and Brånemark implants in patients treated with full-arch bridges. Results after 12-15 years. Clin. Oral Implants Res., 2013, 24, 10, 1144-1151.

5. Beretta M. i wsp.: Long-term survival rate of implants placed in conjunction with 246 sinus floor elevation procedures: Results of a 15-year retrospective study. J. Dent., 2015, 43, 1, 78-86.

6. Jung R.E. i wsp.: Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry: a systematic review. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants,  2009, 24,  Suppl., 92-109.

7. Besimo C.E., Lambrecht J.T., Guindy J.S.: Accuracy of implant treatment planning utilizing template-guided reformatted computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., 2000, 29, 1, 46-51.

8. Balshi S.F., Wolfinger G.J., Balshi T.J.: Surgical planning and prosthesis construction using computed tomography, CAD/CAM technology, and the Internet for immediate loading of dental implants. J. Esthet. Restor. Dent., 2006, 18, 6, 312-323.

9. Jabero M., Sarment D.P.: Advanced surgical guidance technology: a review. Implant Dent.,  2006, 15, 2, 135-142.

10. Brodala N.: Flapless surgery and its effect on dental implant outcomes. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants, 2009, 24,  Suppl., 118-125.

11. Nenke E. i wsp.: Patient-centred outcomes comparing transmucosal implant placement with an open approach in the maxilla: a prospective, non-randomized pilot study. Clin. Oral Implants Res., 2007, 18, 2, 197-203.

12. Flügge T.V. i wsp.: Three-dimensional plotting and printing of an implant drilling guide: simplifying guided implant surgery. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.,  2013, 71, 8), 1340-1346.

13. Cassetta M. i wsp.: The intrinsic error of a stereolithographic surgical template in implant guided surgery. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 2013, 42, 2), 264-275.

14. Di Giacomo G.A. i wsp.: Accuracy and complications of computer-designed selective laser sintering surgical guides for flapless dental implant placement and immediate definitive prosthesis installation. J. Periodontol., 2012, 83, 4, 410-419.

15. Park J.M. i wsp.: Comparison of five-axis milling and rapid prototyping for implant surgical templates. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac .Implants., 2014, 29, 2, 374-383.

16. Ibrahim D. i wsp.: Dimensional error of selective laser sintering, three-dimensional printing and PolyJet models in the reproduction of mandibular anatomy. J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg., 2009, 37, 3, 167-173.

17. Schicho K. i wsp.: Accuracy of treatment planning based on stereolithography in computer assisted surgery. Med. Phys.,  2006,  33, 9, 3408-3459.
18. Leiggener C. i wsp.: A selective laser sintering guide for transferring a virtual plan to real time surgery in composite mandibular reconstruction with free fibula osseous flaps. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.,  2009, 38, 2, 187-192.

19. Park J.M. i wsp.: Comparison of five-axis milling and rapid prototyping for implant surgical templates. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants., 2014,  29, 2, 374-383.

20. Nickenig H.J., Eitner S.: An alternative method to match planned and achieved positions of implants, after virtual planning using cone-beam CT data and surgical guide templates--a method reducing patient radiation exposure (part I). J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg.,  2010, 38, 6, 436-40.

21. Cassetta M. i wsp.: Is it possible to improve the accuracy of implants inserted with a stereolithographic surgical guide by reducing the tolerance between mechanical components? Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 2013, 42, 7, 887-890.

22. Mandelaris G.A. i wsp.: Computer-guided implant dentistry for precise implant placement: combining specialized stereolithographically generated drilling guides and surgical implant instrumentation. Int J. Periodontics Restorative Dent. ,2010, 30, 3, 275-281.

23. Di Giacomo G.A. i wsp.: Clinical application of stereolithographic surgical guides for implant placement: preliminary results. J. Periodontol., 2005, 76, 4, 503-507.

24. Valente F., Schiroli G., Sbrenna A.: Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants, 2009, 24, 2, 234-242.

25. Ramasamy M. i wsp.: Implant surgical guides: from the past to the present. J. Pharm. Bioallied Sci., 2013, 5, Suppl. 1, S98-S102.

26. Horner K. i wsp.: Basic principles for use of dental cone beam computed tomography: consensus guidelines of the European Academy of Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., 2009, 38, 4, 187-195.

27. Dandekeri S.S., Sowmya M.K., Bhandary S.: Stereolithographic surgical template: a review. J. Clin. Diagn. Res., 2013, 7, 9, 2093-2095.


29. Arisan V., Karabuda Z.C., Ozdemir T.: Accuracy of two stereolithographic guide systems for computer-aided implant placement: a computed tomography-based clinical comparative study. J. Periodontol., 2010, 81, 1, 43-51.

30. Vercruyssen M. i wsp.: The use of CT scan based planning for oral rehabilitation by means of implants and its transfer to the surgical field: a critical review on accuracy. J. Oral Rehabil., 2008, 35, 6, 454-474.

31. Stumpel L.J.: Deformation of stereolithographically produced surgical guides: an observational case series report. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res., 2012, 14, 3, 442-453.

32. D’Haese J. i wsp.: A prospective study on the accuracy of mucosally supported stereolithographic surgical guides in fully edentulous maxillae. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res., 2012,14, 2, 293-303.

33. Frisardi G. i wsp.: Integration of 3D anatomical data obtained by CT imaging and 3D optical scanning for computer aided implant surgery. BMC Med. Imaging,  2011 Feb 21;11, 5 doi, 10.1186/1471-2342-11-5.

34. van Steenberghe D. i wsp.: A custom template and definitive prosthesis allowing immediate implant loading in the maxilla: a clinical report. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants, 2002, 17, 5, 663-70.

35. Park C. i wsp.: Accuracy of implant placement using precision surgical guides with varying occlusogingival heights: an in vitro study. J. Prosthet. Dent., 2009, 101, 6, 372-381.

36. Berdougo M. i wsp.: Flapless implant surgery using an image-guided system. A 1- to 4-year retrospective multicenter comparative clinical study. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res.,  2010, 12, 2, 142-152.

37. Danza M., Zollino I., Carinci F.: Comparison between implants inserted with and without computer planning and custom model coordination. J. Craniofac. Surg., 2009, 20, 4, 1086-1092.

38. Hultin M., Svensson K.G., Trulsson M.: Clinical advantages of computer-guided implant placement: a systematic review. Clin. Oral Implants Res., 2012, 23, Suppl. 6, 124-135.

39. Van Assche N. i wsp.: Accuracy of computer-aided implant placement. Clin. Oral Implants Res., 2012, 23, Suppl. 6, 112-123.

40. Cassetta M. i wsp.: Depth deviation and occurrence of early surgical complications or unexpected events using a single stereolithographic surgi-guide. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg., 2011, 40, 12, 1377-1387.

41. Kim S.G. i wsp.: An advanced navigational surgery system for dental implants completed in a single visit: an in vitro study. J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg.,  2015, 43, 1, 117-125.

42. Kang S.H. i wsp.: Verification of the usability of a navigation method in dental implant surgery: in vitro comparison with the stereolithographic surgical guide template method. Craniomaxillofac. Surg., 2014, 42, 7, 1530-1535.